[PATCH 1/4] netfilter: xt_recent: fix regression in rules using a zero hit_count

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>

Commit 8ccb92ad (netfilter: xt_recent: fix false match) fixed supposedly
false matches in rules using a zero hit_count. As it turns out there is
nothing false about these matches and people are actually using entries
with a hit_count of zero to make rules dependant on addresses inserted
manually through /proc.

Since this slipped past the eyes of three reviewers, instead of
reverting the commit in question, this patch explicitly checks
for a hit_count of zero to make the intentions more clear.

Reported-by: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/netfilter/xt_recent.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c b/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c
index 7073dbb..971d172 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_recent.c
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ recent_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_match_param *par)
 		for (i = 0; i < e->nstamps; i++) {
 			if (info->seconds && time_after(time, e->stamps[i]))
 				continue;
-			if (info->hit_count && ++hits >= info->hit_count) {
+			if (!info->hit_count || ++hits >= info->hit_count) {
 				ret = !ret;
 				break;
 			}
-- 
1.6.5.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux