Re: nf-next: netfilter: xt_recent: Add an entry reaper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/16/2010 02:31 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

On Tuesday 2010-03-16 20:43, Tim Gardner wrote:

One of the problems with the way xt_recent is implemented is that
there is no efficient way to remove expired entries. Of course,
one can write a rule '-m recent --remove', but you have to know
beforehand which entry to delete. This commit adds reaper
logic which checks the head of the LRU list when a rule
is invoked that has a '--seconds' value and XT_RECENT_REAP set. If an
entry ceases to accumulate time stamps, then it will eventually bubble
to the top of the LRU list where it is then reaped.

Thanks, this looks fine. My only concern is that we currently
don't catch unknown flags, so userspace won't get an error if
the option is used and the kernel doesn't support it. If you
document this clearly we can ignore it this one time, but I'd
appreciate if you could send me a patch on top to check for
unknown flags and refuse them.

Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner<tim.gardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks.

Thusly? (attached)

[patch]

Why not make this an enum constant like the rest of the flags?
It's perfectly fine to say

enum {
	a,
	c = a | b,
};

as long as it's const/compile-time-computable.


I guess because I'm old school I just hacked out a macro without really thinking about it. Its long been my habit to never used a signed quantity in a device driver unless signedness is really called for.

rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gardner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux