Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> +static struct inode *nsfd_mkinode(void)
>> +{
>> + struct inode *inode;
>> + inode = new_inode(nsfd_mnt->mnt_sb);
>> + if (!inode)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> + inode->i_fop = &nsfd_file_operations;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Mark the inode dirty from the very beginning,
>> + * that way it will never be moved to the dirty
>> + * list because mark_inode_dirty() will think that
>> + * it already _is_ on the dirty list.
>> + */
>> + inode->i_state = I_DIRTY;
>> + inode->i_mode = S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR;
>> + inode->i_uid = current_fsuid();
>> + inode->i_gid = current_fsgid();
>> + inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
>> + return inode;
>> +}
>
> Why not use anon inodes?
Because you can't mount them anywhere.
>> diff --git a/include/linux/nstype.h b/include/linux/nstype.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..3bdf856
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/linux/nstype.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>> +#ifndef _LINUX_NSTYPE_H
>> +#define _LINUX_NSTYPE_H
>> +
>> +#define NSTYPE_NET 0
>> +
>> +#endif /* _LINUX_NSTYPE_H */
>
> Yet another set of per-namespace IDs along with CLONE_NEWXXX ones?
> I currently have a way to create all namespaces we have with one
> syscall. Why don't we have an ability to enter them all with one syscall?
The CLONE_NEWXXX series of bits has been an royal pain to work with,
and it appears to be unnecessary complications for no gain.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
