Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing control.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Introduce two new system calls:
int nsfd(pid_t pid, unsigned long nstype);
int setns(unsigned long nstype, int fd);

These two new system calls address three specific problems that can
make namespaces hard to work with.
- Namespaces require a dedicated process to pin them in memory.
- It is not possible to use a namespace unless you are the
  child of the original creator.
- Namespaces don't have names that userspace can use to talk
  about them.

The nsfd() system call returns a file descriptor that can
be used to talk about a specific namespace, and to keep
the specified namespace alive.

The fd returned by nsfd() can be bind mounted as:
mount --bind /proc/self/fd/N /some/filesystem/path
to keep the namespace alive indefinitely as long as
it is mounted.

open works on the fd returned by nsfd() so another
process can get a hold of it and do interesting things.

Overall that allows for persistent naming of namespaces
according to userspace policy.

setns() allows changing the namespace of the current process
to a namespace that originates with nsfd().

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Is it planned to support all the namespaces for 'nsfd' ?
I mean will it be possible to specify an Or'ed combination of nstype to grab a reference for several namespaces at a time of the targeted process ?

for example : nsfd( 1234, NSTYPE_NET | NSTYPE_IPC, NSTYPE_MNT)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux