Jiri Pirko wrote: > Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:54:50PM CET, jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> On Thursday 2010-02-25 13:18, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >>>>> I want to ask if there is any particular reason for ipt_CLUSTERIP to support >>>>> only address length of 6 (ETH_ALEN)? It seems to me reasonable for this to work >>>>> even with another types of network hw with different addr_len. >>>> None that I'm aware of, but the length is also used in the ABI, >>>> so you presently can't supply larger addresses. >>> Not directly related to this but I wanted to discuss this time ago. Now >>> that we have xt_CLUSTER I think that we can deprecate ipt_CLUSTERIP. >> xt_CLUSTER - where in the tree would that be? > > I was trying to find it too. I guess it stands out of it (at least net-next). sorry, it's xt_cluster, no capitalization. pablo@decadence:~/devel/scm/git/nf-2.6$ ls net/netfilter/xt_cluster.c It's there since quite some time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
