On Thursday 2010-02-11 17:06, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Thursday 2010-02-11 10:00, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>
>>> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>>> +static inline const struct ip6t_entry_target *
>>>> +ip6t_get_target_c(const struct ip6t_entry *e)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return ip6t_get_target((struct ip6t_entry *)e);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>> I would prefer a macro over these get_target_c functions.
>>
>> Why so?
>
>Because it avoids having a function for const and one for non-const.
Well, I need two. One that returns const and one that does not;
ip6t_get_target_c is signaturally-incompatible with ip6t_get_target.
FWIW, the function is removed later on anyway ("remove remaining xt1
code").
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
