On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 14:37 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Jon Masters wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 14:04 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> In any case, we need a fix for this suitable for 2.6.33. If > >> you don't like using the pointer, please send a patch to add > >> an id to the network namespaces. > > > > Right. I think the quick solution is fine for 2.6.33. So that makes the > > hashtable non-resize patch, the crash fix, and the cachep bits. I will > > try to get involved and help you out with the per-ns hashtable clean > > rather than just being a whiner :) > > This is the patch I'm going to commit unless unless there are further > objections. Its Eric's patch with a change on top to allocate a unique > name for the slab. > > > Thanks a bunch! Fedora kernels have already been built with this fix, > > since it will allow us to close a fair number of "KVM goes boom" bugs. > > Thanks as well for your help. Patch looks fine to me for the moment, unless it *really* matters about the pointer exposure. Jon. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
