On Monday 2010-01-25 17:47, Patrick McHardy wrote: >Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Monday 2010-01-25 16:37, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>> include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h | 22 +++ >>> include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_conntrack.h | 2 + >>> include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h | 2 + >>> include/linux/netfilter/xt_CT.h | 14 ++ >> >> Is there anything that prohibits using a little-more descriptive >> name, like xt_CONNTRACK? >> That btw reminds me that, perhaps, we could/should avoid >> same-name different-case (cf. xt_conntrack) in future, >> so xt_CONNTRACK would not fly too well. > >I thought CT is an established term for connection tracking. >I don't care much, but I prefer a short name like CT. If you go by the "established" argument, I'd point out "counter-terrorists", but ok ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
