Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Samir Bellabes (sam@xxxxxxxxx): > > This reverts commit 8651d5c0b1f874c5b8307ae2b858bc40f9f02482. > > > > snet needs to reintroduce this hook, as it was designed to be: a hook for > > updating security informations on objects. > > > > Signed-off-by: Samir Bellabes <sam@xxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> > > (contingent of course on the proposed user actually going in :) > > > diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c > > index 8984973..fcd4f2b 100644 > > --- a/net/socket.c > > +++ b/net/socket.c > > @@ -1557,6 +1557,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(accept4, int, fd, struct sockaddr __user *, upeer_sockaddr, > > fd_install(newfd, newfile); > > err = newfd; > > > > + security_socket_post_accept(sock, newsock); > > + > > out_put: > > fput_light(sock->file, fput_needed); > > out: I think we should call security_socket_post_accept() before fd_install(). Otherwise, other threads which share fd tables can use security-informations-not-yet-updated accept()ed sockets. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
