Re: [Fwd: Re: libnetfilter_conntrack]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Zdenek Vasicek wrote:
Dear authors,
I would like to ask you about help. I have installed latest version of the libnetfilter_conntrack (libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.100, libnfnetlink-1.0.0) and I have found that the src and dest address (ipv4) as well as src and dest port are always empty (zero). However, if I look into /proc/net/nf_conntrack, everything is ok. The kernel version is 2.6.32.

Example:
 libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.100/utils/conntrack_dump
ipv4 2 tcp 6 431999 src=0.0.0.0 dst=0.0.0.0 sport=0 dport=0 packets=13087 bytes=851624 src=0.0.0.0 dst=0.0.0.0 sport=0 dport=0 packets=14940 bytes=8636188 [ASSURED] mark=0 use=2

 /proc/net/nf_conntrack
ipv4 2 tcp 6 431999 ESTABLISHED src=147.229.13.xx dst=147.229.14.xx sport=40868 dport=22 packets=13236 bytes=861344 src=147.229.14.xx dst=147.229.....

Can you please help me to solve this bug? I didn't have any problems with conntrack and ulog before. I suppose that there must to be incompatibility between kernel and libnetfilter.

There's a similar bug in bugzilla.netfilter.org [1], for some reason the kernel is not including the address and the port in the messages sent to userspace. Could you send me your .config file?

[1] http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux