Le 10/12/2009 19:53, Jan Engelhardt a écrit : > > On Donnerstag 2009-12-10 18:50, Laurent Chavey wrote: >> >> good point. I agree with the need for the exception, I would just >> like it to be more explicit in the code itself (like a turn off >> check around that particular statement) so we do not have to scrub >> thru the compiler output to filter out good / bad warning. question: >> why do we not force the timestamp in the skb before going thru the >> chain ? > > Because it is probably too expensive to do, unless you employ > things like xt_time? Right. On some platforms, timestamps are quite expensive (say, a fraction of one micro second to get one of them), we try to avoid them as much as possible. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
