On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 11:22 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > There is one problem however, we already have the SNMP NAT helper, > which also registers for the SNMP port. Those would clash if you > add a second registration. Does that mean that even a simple copy of nf_conntrack_netbios_ns.c with the port changed to 161 wouldn't work, or just that a more general solution would be hard to implement? What's the solution to that? Must there be a single conntrack module to handle both the SNMP broadcast queries and SNMP NAT? Tim. */
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
