Re: stomping static data pull

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 2009-10-29 16:59, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> On Wednesday 2009-10-28 16:57, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>>> I incorporated your suggestions and propose this new 4-series set.
>>> Could you give me a short description of the changes relative
>>> to the first incarnation? Thanks.
>> 
>> http://osdir.com/ml/general/2009-08/msg10540.html
>> - splitting xt_repldata_create
>> - giving it a name of your choice
>> - return semantics (found a missing return keyword; just refreshed top 
>> is commit v2.6.32-rc3-4-g7891b6c)
>> 
>
>OK thanks, that leaves my worries about adding additional runtime
>overhead. I'll do some quick benchmarks to see if it really has
>a measurable impact.
>
How would one measure this in a meaningful way? rdtsc? (that would only 
work on x86, in fact.)

And I guess that one could 
always construct a case whereby the patched result looks 'slow'. :/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux