Re: Avoiding multiple calls to xt_target.checkentry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 2009-11-05 16:00, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>Adam Nielsen wrote in summer 2009:
>>>> Thanks for the explanation!  So - to get it straight in my mind - the
>>>> checkentry function will be called multiple times while the trigger
>>>> exists,
>>>> but is the destroy function also called multiple times?  Or is checkentry
>>>> called whenever tables are created, but destroy only ever called once
>>>> when the
>>>> table is removed for the last time?
>>> They will always be called an equal amount of times - each one
>>> once per target instance.
>> 
>> Great, thanks for the info (thanks Jan too!)  I'm working on a patch so I'll
>> post it when I think I've solved the issue correctly.
>
>Just wondering whether there's still hope for this issue to get fixed.
>
>I haven't added the LED extension to iptables yet, so if there's no
>interest in fixing this, we can remove the LED target again.

An increasing number of modules want to keep a global state.
Currently, xt_recent and xt_RATEEST do that in the kernel; xt_quota3
(Xt-a) also does its own management — basically just a
name=>personal_struct mapping —, and xt_LED would now need such state
keeping too. It seems preferable to somehow join that together and
funnel that into xtables.c. What do you think?
Meanwhile, let me prep some commit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux