Thomas Jarosch wrote: > On Thursday, 17. September 2009 13:24:39 you wrote: >> Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: >>> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>>> I got one reject in the removal of nf_conntrack_tcp_update() due >>>> to the use of write_lock() instead of spin_lock() in your patch >>>> (seems to be based on an old tree), this is the patch I committed: >>> Uhh, I forgot to forward-port the patch, sorry: I used the 2.6.30.5 >>> tree for verifying the bug and testing the fix. >> I double checked and it looks fine, apart from the minor reject. >> I'll give it some testing myself before pushing upstream. > > Maybe that's something for -stable? > > Kernel 2.6.30.9 still seems affected (the patch applies cleanly). Yes, I'll pass it on to -stable once its upstream (which should be very soon now). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
