Re: xt_stealth as separate patch against xtables-addons-1.17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 2009-09-01 19:52, Jan Rafaj wrote:
> Hello Jan,
>
> As per your request, I'm sending the
>
> - xt_ACCOUNT
> - xt_pknock
> - xt_stealth
>
> ports, now each one as a standalone patch against xtables-addons-1.17 pristine,
> so that they can each start life in their own Xt-a git branch.

I looked at xt_stealth and it looks like

 -A INPUT -j sktest
 -A sktest -m socket -j RETURN
 -A sktest -j DROP

can do just the same.
Please tell me if I am wrong anywhere.

That would mean there is no need for xt_stealth.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux