Hi Christoph,
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> Oh, sure, the fix looks sane to me. It's just that I am a complete
>> coward when it comes to merging RCU related patches so I always try to
>> fish an Acked-by from Paul or Christoph ;).
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Christoph
Lameter<cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am fine with acking the poison piece.
Ok.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Christoph
Lameter<cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I did not ack the patch that added rcu to kmem_cache_destroy() and I
> likely wont ack that piece either.
Right. I didn't remember that I merged that over your NAK but I don't
share your view that kmem_cache_destroy() callers should do
rcu_barrier() or whatever is necessary if we can do it from
kmem_cache_destroy(). So I am happy to take both changes but I would
appreciate them being split into two separate patches.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
