On 2009-06-10 12:19:59, Patrick wrote: >On Wednesday 2009-06-10 14:16, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> >>Git is not as castrated as Hg when it comes to branches, so why not >>make a "stable" branch that is then regularly merged into master? :) > >I don't see why that would currently be necessary. We're talking >about a few days, and in fact I'd rather have people test the >current code before the release instead of hacking on new things :) Yeah but in general? The - judging from their version numbers - x.y.z.S stable versions like 1.4.3.1 used to receive lots of new features because there is just master, in which case it should have been the new 1.4.4 already. So either z is bumped more often and S-versions will not be released, or S only receives fixes, necessiting a separate branch. Objections? Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
