On Monday 2009-06-22 08:31, Philip Craig wrote: > >The problem is that state_mask in 'struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo1' is >only 8 bit, but XT_CONNTRACK_STATE_UNTRACKED == 256. >Unfortunately, gcc doesn't warn about this for '|=', only for '='. I smell a gcc-missing-feature there. >Looks like we need a conntrack match v2 to fix this? Here is the kernel patch, please apply. Userspace as a reply. -----8<----- parent deb9f8e170eff8fd0476536bac3bf9bdc222d4ed (v2.6.30-5372-gdeb9f8e) commit 366d5a252fd0de33d7b3ef669551a8771748c9e3 Author: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Jun 25 18:35:39 2009 +0200 netfilter: xtables: conntrack revision 2 As reported by Philip, the UNTRACKED state bit does not fit within the 8-bit state_mask member. Enlarge state_mask and give status_mask a few more bits too. Reported-by: Philip Craig <philipc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> References: http://markmail.org/thread/b7eg6aovfh4agyz7 Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> --- include/linux/netfilter/xt_conntrack.h | 13 +++++ net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/xt_conntrack.h b/include/linux/netfilter/xt_conntrack.h index 3430c77..7ae0533 100644 --- a/include/linux/netfilter/xt_conntrack.h +++ b/include/linux/netfilter/xt_conntrack.h @@ -81,4 +81,17 @@ struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo1 { __u8 state_mask, status_mask; }; +struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo2 { + union nf_inet_addr origsrc_addr, origsrc_mask; + union nf_inet_addr origdst_addr, origdst_mask; + union nf_inet_addr replsrc_addr, replsrc_mask; + union nf_inet_addr repldst_addr, repldst_mask; + __u32 expires_min, expires_max; + __u16 l4proto; + __be16 origsrc_port, origdst_port; + __be16 replsrc_port, repldst_port; + __u16 match_flags, invert_flags; + __u16 state_mask, status_mask; +}; + #endif /*_XT_CONNTRACK_H*/ diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c b/net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c index 0b7139f..fc58180 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ conntrack_addrcmp(const union nf_inet_addr *kaddr, static inline bool conntrack_mt_origsrc(const struct nf_conn *ct, - const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo1 *info, + const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo2 *info, u_int8_t family) { return conntrack_addrcmp(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple.src.u3, @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ conntrack_mt_origsrc(const struct nf_conn *ct, static inline bool conntrack_mt_origdst(const struct nf_conn *ct, - const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo1 *info, + const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo2 *info, u_int8_t family) { return conntrack_addrcmp(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple.dst.u3, @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ conntrack_mt_origdst(const struct nf_conn *ct, static inline bool conntrack_mt_replsrc(const struct nf_conn *ct, - const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo1 *info, + const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo2 *info, u_int8_t family) { return conntrack_addrcmp(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple.src.u3, @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ conntrack_mt_replsrc(const struct nf_conn *ct, static inline bool conntrack_mt_repldst(const struct nf_conn *ct, - const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo1 *info, + const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo2 *info, u_int8_t family) { return conntrack_addrcmp(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple.dst.u3, @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ conntrack_mt_repldst(const struct nf_conn *ct, } static inline bool -ct_proto_port_check(const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo1 *info, +ct_proto_port_check(const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo2 *info, const struct nf_conn *ct) { const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple; @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ ct_proto_port_check(const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo1 *info, static bool conntrack_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_match_param *par) { - const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo1 *info = par->matchinfo; + const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo2 *info = par->matchinfo; enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo; const struct nf_conn *ct; unsigned int statebit; @@ -278,6 +278,16 @@ conntrack_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_match_param *par) return true; } +static bool +conntrack_mt_v1(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_match_param *par) +{ + const struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo2 *const *info = par->matchinfo; + struct xt_match_param newpar = *par; + + newpar.matchinfo = *info; + return conntrack_mt(skb, &newpar); +} + static bool conntrack_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par) { if (nf_ct_l3proto_try_module_get(par->family) < 0) { @@ -288,11 +298,45 @@ static bool conntrack_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par) return true; } +static bool conntrack_mt_check_v1(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par) +{ + struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo1 *info = par->matchinfo; + struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo2 *up; + int ret = conntrack_mt_check(par); + + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + up = kmalloc(sizeof(*up), GFP_KERNEL); + if (up == NULL) { + nf_ct_l3proto_module_put(par->family); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + /* + * The strategy here is to minimize the overhead of v1 matching, + * by prebuilding a v2 struct and putting the pointer into the + * v1 dataspace. + */ + memcpy(up, info, offsetof(typeof(*info), state_mask)); + up->state_mask = info->state_mask; + up->status_mask = info->status_mask; + *(void **)info = up; + return true; +} + static void conntrack_mt_destroy(const struct xt_mtdtor_param *par) { nf_ct_l3proto_module_put(par->family); } +static void conntrack_mt_destroy_v1(const struct xt_mtdtor_param *par) +{ + struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo2 **info = par->matchinfo; + kfree(*info); + conntrack_mt_destroy(par); +} + #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT struct compat_xt_conntrack_info { @@ -363,6 +407,16 @@ static struct xt_match conntrack_mt_reg[] __read_mostly = { .revision = 1, .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC, .matchsize = sizeof(struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo1), + .match = conntrack_mt_v1, + .checkentry = conntrack_mt_check_v1, + .destroy = conntrack_mt_destroy_v1, + .me = THIS_MODULE, + }, + { + .name = "conntrack", + .revision = 2, + .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC, + .matchsize = sizeof(struct xt_conntrack_mtinfo2), .match = conntrack_mt, .checkentry = conntrack_mt_check, .destroy = conntrack_mt_destroy, -- # Created with git-export-patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
