Re: [PATCH -tip 0/3] expedited "big hammer" RCU grace periods

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:03:03PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > >  include/linux/rcuclassic.h    |   15 ++-
> > 
> > heh, we dont have this file anymore ... as of today, right? :)
> 
> Ah, I was assuming that expedited RCU would happen before removal 
> of Classic RCU.

Our general preference is to zap code.

/me stares at:

  $ git diff --stat -M v2.6.30..v2.6.31-rc1 | tail -1
  7743 files changed, 782278 insertions(+), 403162 deletions(-)

/me corrects himself:

Okay, so the zapping of code is the divine guiding principle we've 
been following for 15 years. Ending up with a kernel that is 11 
million lines of code is a small imperfection of mankind and is to 
be fixed.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux