Hi. On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:46:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds (torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > All those references support my argument that the lock is being > > used recursively in this case. > > What's so hard between understanding the difference between "used > recursively" and "recursive lock"? > > THEY MEAN TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT THINGS! > > The fact that you don't seem to understand that is one of the things I've > been complaining about all along. Just ot be sure readers will not lose the discssion topic: do you object against naming or realizaion? If its about the former, does 'dog's breath lock' proposed by Stephen fit? -- Evgeniy Polyakov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
