On Monday 2009-04-20 12:12, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > >But ulogd2 requires the ULOG target What purpose would NFLOG serve then? >and ULOG cannot log the SNAT-ed address either, similarly to the >vanilla LOG target: there's presently no hook at which the >information is available for the LOG/ULOG targets. I favor the patch because the raw table gets a POSTROUTING hook ;-) >> I think that Patrick is not going to like the idea of adding more hooks, >> what do you think Patrick? > >Yes, the additional hook is suboptimal. But I couldn't find any other >way to get the data. The rawpost_table, as in the RAWNAT branch of Xtables-addons. While the additional table is probably just as suboptimal, at least you can unload it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
