On Wednesday 2009-04-15 13:53, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Patrick McHardy wrote: >> [Resend to mailing list, I didn't notice this had left bugzilla] >> >> Martin Josefsson wrote: >>> Patrick, how about making the ipaddress selection based on only client >>> ipaddress behaviour selectable with an SNAT parameter if the problem with the >>> patch is that the distribution can be uneven for a small number of clients? >> >> Actually I think the results back then were incorrect or it was >> just bad luck or something. Ideally we would just enable this >> unconditionally I think. I'll do some testing of the distribution >> myself during the next days and see how it goes. > > The distribution did suffer noticably in some cases, so offering > this optionally seems better. > > How about this patch? If the IP_NAT_RANGE_PERSISTENT flag is set > on a NAT range, we ignore the destination address in the selection. But where do you set IP_NAT_RANGE_PERSISTENT? (It seems like a dead feature right now.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
