[Patrick McHardy - Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 04:46:16PM +0100]
> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> Yes, no problem, wait a bit please.
>>
>> Btw, I think the bestest way (and surely more clean)
>> would be to use some new form of the sysctl templates.
>>
>> But I didn't find such a form of writting which would
>> sutisfy me. Since you said those enums are written in
>> stone it's safe to use iterative fasion indeed but
>> as I see you found them not that "pretty" too :)
>
> I just like the code structure with all definitions and initializations
> at the top better. But that obviously isn't possible with network
> namespaces, so just ignore me :)
>
>> On the other hand -- if per-net initialization is not
>> that critical in speed (ie some speed could be sacrificed
>> for the code clarity -- I could play with those templates
>> maybe). Just a thought.
>
> For now lets just get this stuff in since I think its about the last
> bits for full netfilter namespace support. I'll happily take further
> cleanups of course, but I don't think its worth delaying this any
> longer.
>
ok, I'm almost sending them (last compile test on every patch,
please give me a few minutes)
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
