Re: [PATCH] ctnetlink: optional packet drop to make event delivery reliable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick McHardy wrote:
> But it seems rather pointless to add it in this state, it doesn't
> increase reliability one bit. Additionally reversing the order of
> state transitions and event delivery seems like a highly intrusive
> change since event delivery obviously already needs to know the
> new state, meaning we'd need to record all state changes, then
> deliver the event, then "commit" them. So I'd like to see what
> we're engaging in before merging this half finished patch.

I see, I'm going to send you a new patch so we can discuss on something
in particular.

-- 
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux