On Thu March 12 2009 wrote Jan Engelhardt: > On Thursday 2009-03-12 16:13, Christoph Paasch wrote: > >As NF_DROP = 0, no packets would ever have been dropped. > > Mh would not it be safer to actually give NF_DROP a real value so that > -NF_DROP also makes sense? Yes, why not... > (Might need checking places where NF_DROP is used.) NF_DROP is used only in tcp_packet (as far as I can see, no other l4 proto uses it in *_packet) -- Christoph Paasch www.rollerbulls.be --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
