On Thursday 2009-02-26 01:14, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>[...] >> IMHO, __uXX should be replaced by uintX_t, but a move this great I >> will leave to future generations because there is just too much >> persisting opinions wrt. such proposal. As such I'd like to join >> and persist on my position and that uintX that we have should be kept. > > We *CAN'T* replace __uXX with uintX_t. Period, full stop, end of story. Would the mindful master please elaborate why this is so, if it is indeed not a personal decision. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
