On 02/18, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Unlike __mod_timer(..., bool pending_only), it preserves the CPU on > > which the timer is pending. > > > > Or, perhaps, we can modify __mod_timer() further, > > if then i'd put it into a separate commit. > > I think the auto-migration of all the mod_timer() variants is a > scalability feature: if for example a networking socket's main > user migrates to another CPU, then the timer 'follows' it - even > if the timer never actually expires (which is quite common for > high-speed high-reliability networking transports). OK. But sometimes it is better (or necessary) to prevent the migration. Since you already are changed __mod_timer() it would be ugly to add yet another helper. Perhaps we should turn "bool pending_only" into "int flags" right now? This is minor, and perhaps we will never need the TIMER_DONT_MIGRATE flag. But if ever need, then we have to audit all callers. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html