Jan Engelhardt wrote:
The seqprinting (knowingly that I suggested it) has a bit of a drawback the way you use it -- if userspace passes a buffer of, say, size 11, then the first seq_printf will succeed in stuffing " 1 NONE (" into the buffer; it then has 2 left. Because t->name is probably more descriptive than that, the second seq_printf will fail, breaking out of the loop, calling seq_stop, etc. and userspace gets 9 as the return value for the read() it attempted. However, when userspace now tries to read() again, as it is absolutely entitled to, the " 1 NONE (" will be printed again into the buffer -- which is rather undesirable. ... Maybe the authors of seq_file can offer some better function that takes care of this?
seqfile operates on records not characters and always provides one page of memory. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html