Re: [PATCH 7/8] [PATCH] dynamic calculation of event message size for ctnetlink

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> These calculations look somewhat expensive to perform for every message.
>> Do you have any numbers for this new patch that shows the difference
>> in CPU usage compared to the resizing done by af_netlink.c?
> 
> Fabian Hugelshofer reported some reduction (~5%) on an embedded
> environment but he was using top to measure the difference. I'll collect
> some more trustable data and get back to you.

Some oprofile results:

wo/patch
2189      0.0305  nf_conntrack_netlink.ko  nf_conntrack_netlink
ctnetlink_conntrack_event

w/patch
2302      0.0440  nf_conntrack_netlink.ko  nf_conntrack_netlink
ctnetlink_conntrack_event

While __alloc_skb and netlink_broadcast report similar values for w/ and
wo/ the patch.

-- 
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux