[patch 18/27] netfilter: restore lost ifdef guarding defrag exception

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2.6.27-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us 
know.

------------------
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>

netfilter: restore lost #ifdef guarding defrag exception

Upstream commit 38f7ac3eb:

Nir Tzachar <nir.tzachar@xxxxxxxxx> reported a warning when sending
fragments over loopback with NAT:

[ 6658.338121] WARNING: at net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_standalone.c:89 nf_nat_fn+0x33/0x155()

The reason is that defragmentation is skipped for already tracked connections.
This is wrong in combination with NAT and ip_conntrack actually had some ifdefs
to avoid this behaviour when NAT is compiled in.

The entire "optimization" may seem a bit silly, for now simply restoring the
lost #ifdef is the easiest solution until we can come up with something better.

Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c
@@ -150,10 +150,12 @@ static unsigned int ipv4_conntrack_defra
 					  const struct net_device *out,
 					  int (*okfn)(struct sk_buff *))
 {
+#if !defined(CONFIG_NF_NAT) && !defined(CONFIG_NF_NAT_MODULE)
 	/* Previously seen (loopback)?  Ignore.  Do this before
 	   fragment check. */
 	if (skb->nfct)
 		return NF_ACCEPT;
+#endif
 
 	/* Gather fragments. */
 	if (ip_hdr(skb)->frag_off & htons(IP_MF | IP_OFFSET)) {

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux