On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 03:12:03PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> One needs to add ".netns_ok = 1" to igmp_protocol to test all of this
>> with ebtables() in netns.
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> [PATCH 1/7] netns ebtables: part 1
>>
>> * make list of ebt_tables per-netns
>> * propagate netns from userspace, register table in passed netns
>> * temporarily register every ebt_table in init_net
>
> I'm not queuing patches for 2.6.29 yet, please resend the entire
> batch once Dave opens his net-next tree again.
>
>> --- a/include/net/netns/x_tables.h
>> +++ b/include/net/netns/x_tables.h
>> @@ -6,5 +6,6 @@
>> struct netns_xt {
>> struct list_head tables[NPROTO];
>> + struct list_head ebt_tables;
>
> This could just use tables[NFPROTO_BRIDGE].
Good!
[drops some code]
I do wonder why these new numbers a) contain holes and b) exported in
headers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
