On Monday 2008-10-06 12:23, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> It used to be that {ip,ip6,etc}_tables called extension->checkentry
>> themselves, but this can be moved into the xtables core.
>
> This one doesn't apply cleanly:
>
> patching file net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 684.
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c.rej
>
> Since I guess this will introduce new rejects in the following
> patches, I'll wait until you've figured out what went wrong.
> I've applied the patches in the order specified on top of
> 8d51a6615, replacing the previous patches.
By logic alone already, I can say I dunno what's going on.
SHAshing in git ensures that the SHA identifies all ancestors.
Unless perhaps, we found the first hash collision...
You could repush your tree and let me check, or you can check
with mine at git://dev.medozas.de/linux master
There is something that diffs cannot do - ensure proper
parent and tree SHAs ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
