Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 06:58:38PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
static inline void
-nf_conntrack_event_cache(enum ip_conntrack_events event,
+nf_conntrack_event_cache(struct net *net, enum ip_conntrack_events event,
const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
Passing the conntrack instead of the struct net and the skb
would probably keep the callers cleaner.
Dunno, passing netns explicitly like saying conntrack event happened in
netns A, which is reasonable. OTOH, s/skb/ct/ is indeed nicer.
I'll change it as you suggest and see what happens.
BTW, I asked earlier if untracked conntracks are ever supposed to drop into
event cache. If they're, trimming nf_conntrack_untracked is out of question.
No, they are skipped by the only event handler, ctnetlink.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
