On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Dâniel Fraga wrote: > > > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:47:55 +0200 > > Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > If your problem is really FRTO related (that what the patch is for), > > > you could try to disable FRTO temporarily: > > > > Hi, the patch helped, but what's the conclusion? Is the problem > > "solved"? Will this patch be merged in the next kernel? This thread > > seems to be forgotten. > > ...Dave, I think we should probably put this FRTO work-around to net-2.6 > and -stable to remain somewhat robust (it's currently worked around only > for newreno anyway). ...But I leave the final decision up to you. Since you suspect the problem is being caused by a broken middlebox, would it perhaps be a better approach to add a per-route option to allow disabling of FRTO for the given destination. This would be similar to Stephen Hemminger's fix for broken middleboxes that don't handle window scaling properly. It seems this would be better than modifying FRTO behavior for everyone else that is being compliant. A question then arises is if the bogus scenario has a TCP signature that could be used to print a warning message for the unsuspecting user so they could then take necessary corrective action. -Bill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
