Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Monday 2008-07-21 18:50, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_state.c
@@ -30,7 +31,7 @@ state_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *in,
enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
unsigned int statebit;
- if (nf_ct_is_untracked(skb))
+ if (nf_ct_is_untracked(dev_net(in ? in : out), skb))
Does this even do the right thing? Given the forward path, where
both in!=NULL and out!=NULL, why should it specifically be 'in'
that is selected?
It doesn't matter, the namespace during forwaring is always
equal for the input and output devices.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html