On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 18:00 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > > No, I just didn't want to write the same code twice.... that's all, > > what do you suggest, doing that (writing the same code twice)? > > No, a macro is better than duplicating it. I was just wondering > whether a function would also do. Well, this function would have to deal with two unrelated types (offsets_chunk for the first layer, chain_head for the second layer), I don't see immediately how this could be done, any suggestions?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
