Hello, On Friday, 2008 June 27 at 21:41:33 +0200, Eric Leblond wrote: > Hello, > > As I'm about to conclude a massive release of libraries and the tools, I > > think that forcing the use of a recent library version is better as it > > also contains several bugfixes. I did not really understand the meaning of the word "forcing" till I discover that you've forced the use of at least libnfnetlink 0.0.39 in configure.in. IMHO, this is too strict and not an easy step into ulogd2 acceptance: Instead of having a single software to compile, users will need to compile almost all libnf* library :( > Users prefer to use the library packaged in their system and it will > take some time before every distribution includes the required > libnfnetlink_log. This patch finishes to provide a clean backward > compatibility at a really low cost. > > Furthermore, I don't think a gcc warning about "unused variable" will > force a lot of people to upgrade ;) But a strict configure.in will :/ BR, -- Eric Leblond INL: http://www.inl.fr/ NuFW: http://www.nufw.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
