Re: [PATCH 2/3] set SEEN_REPLY before destroying conntrack on TCP RST

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick McHardy wrote:
Fabian Hugelshofer wrote:
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 10:13 +0100, Fabian Hugelshofer wrote:
If a connection fails with a TCP reset, the conntrack is destroyed immediately. This patch sets the SEEN_REPLY bit before destroying the conntrack.

This updated version also increments the accounting counters.

Thanks, but this needs to be changed slightly.
[...]
I think a better way is to encapsulate the del_timer/timeout.function
calls in a nf_ct_kill() function and perform accounting there.
Since all manual invocations of timeout.function are/should be
performed only while handling packets (that are usually not
accounted), this seems like the right way.

Ok, I see. But for accounting ctinfo and skbuf are required. I'll include them in the argument list of nf_ct_kill() and update the function invocations, ok? Or should I introduce an nf_ct_kill_acct()?

I just did another test where my SEEN_REPLY patch was not applied. Surprisingly the SEEN_REPLY bit was set in the destroy events. I am afraid, but I have to assume, that I did not evaluate the bahavior carefully enough. Probably I confused the accounting, no status and no related packets issues.

Unless a race condition might be thinkable, we should leave the SEEN_REPLY patch. If it is possible, that the timeout function immediately triggers the destroy event to be exported over netlink, then the patch is still necessary. I don't see things detailed enough to judge this. If it is necessary, should it be included in nf_ct_kill()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux