Re: [NETFILTER 42/69]: nf_conntrack: optimize hash_conntrack()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Miller wrote:
> But it still means the bit marked packed is going to be
> accessed using byte-at-a-time loads and stores.

That's not what my results showed (the bw() case).

> I guess this is immaterial, as it seems the memset() is the
> best solution anyways.

Yep.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux