Re: [PATCH 7/8] Remove support for compilation of conditional extensions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 2008-04-14 08:56, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Monday 2008-04-14 08:46, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> > Was there some resolution on the discussion that this
>> > is the way to go? I mainly would like to see an ACK
>> > from Jozsef for this change before applying it.
>> >
>> There was some sort of positive agreement:
>> 
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter-devel/msg02729.html (ipset)
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter-devel/msg02727.html (condition)
>
> Yes, "sort of". So far it seems most convenient to keep ipset in
> iptables. What was the exact problem with these extensions again?
>
The problem is not the extensions themselves; but they do not compile
due to a lack of their header files. Should it just be added?

Should ipset instead be added to the kernel?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux