Hello, On Saturday, 2008 April 5 at 17:29:20 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > Eric Leblond wrote: > > I've tested and applied all my not applied ulogd2 patches other current > > subversion tree. They apply cleanly. I've published a git tree which > > contains this patches. > > > > Git tree: http://home.regit.org/~regit/git/ulogd2.git > > Gitweb: http://home.regit.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=ulogd2.git;a=shortlog;h=ML > > > > The ML branch is the one containing all the patches. > > I'm not against the fact of having you all personal git trees with your > developments. However, it make more sense to me to keep development > trees if you have something that will take some time (for different > reasons [1]) to get into mainline, like for example, Krisztian Kovacs's > tproxy. In fact, it was just informative. I just give you the address in case you may find some advantage in using it to retrieve the patches. This git tree is only used internally at INL to be able to develop other the subversion tree. BR, -- Eric Leblond INL: http://www.inl.fr/ NuFW: http://www.nufw.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
