On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:43:19PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Thursday 2008-04-03 15:24, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>> This updates xt_recent to support IPv6 handling. It is sort of a flag >>> day, as the new control directory is /proc/net/xt_recent with a new, >>> more strict protocol (the string you ought to write into >>> /proc/net/xt_recent/LIST). But on the other hand, I kept the binary >>> interface towards iptables (which is quite memory consuming I must >>> say) to keep the patch small. >> >> No flag days please, either keep ipt_recent as compat interface >> (in case you want to share lists) or do something like hashlimit >> and add one file per family, but no xt_recent file. > > I actually thought of using sysfs instead????? do you know if I can > tie a sysfs file to a seq_file? No you can not, as that would defeat the "one value per file" rule for sysfs files. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
