Ok, I admit that was a rather stupid question. For the sake of anyone else googling this later: 1) nfq_callback maps to nfnl_callback and there's no such requirement on nfnl_callback 2) More obviously, one must provide a response via nfq_set_verdict (NF_ACCEPT, NF_DROP, NF_STOLEN, etc) before the next invocation of the callback. Hope this helps someone else! -Chris On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Christopher Taylor <chtaylo3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm assuming that nfq_callback must be reentrant, is this correct? > > Respectfully, > Christopher Taylor > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
