On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:57:55 +0100 Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Eric Dumazet a écrit : > > Denys Fedoryshchenko a écrit : > >> Already patched and tested, it doesn't change anything. > >> > >> > > > > We still leak dsts somewhere. > > > > You could try git bisect, or try to patch net/core/dst.c so that > > dst_gc_task() (line 83) displays > > route informations for say 10 first entries found in the dst_busy_list > > (refcnt, interface, source IP, dest IP, things like that) that could > > ring a bell given your netfilter rules or network conf. > > I cooked a patch (untested) to implement this idea : > > It should display lines similar to /proc/net/rt_cache (reusing the same > helper function) > > I wonder how much the route cache really helps when it grows so large? Robert Olsson had suggested that turning it off when routing would help. Perhaps the route cache is only really useful for local destinations? If the cost of maintaining the route cache exceeds the cost of just using the existing route table, there is no value to having a route cache. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
