Re: helpers register for a specific port, but work anyway

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

> >> >> The 300 proto=6 line comes from conntrack -E --- but if nf_conntrack_ftp
> >> >> does not parse streams to port 2121 by default, how could it have
> >> >> set up the expectation?
> >> >
> >> > When NATing packets the helper lookup is repeated based
> >> > on the final tuple.
> >> 
> >> But the machine I am running conntrack -E and ftp from do not
> >> see the NATting taking place higher up in the routing chain, do they?
> >
> >You had to load the nf_conntrack_ftp module on the client machine too.
> >By which module parameters was it loaded?
> 
> The module was certainly loaded, otherwise `conntrack -E` would
> not have printed anything.
> No parameters were specified, just `modprobe nf_conntrack_ftp`,
> like I said. There is no way it should have analyzed port 2121 ftp.

Any long forgotten nf_conntrack_ftp related option setting under 
/etc/modprobe.d/ or in /etc/modprobe.conf?

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux