Hello, On Sunday, 2008 February 3 at 12:53:09 +0100, Eric Leblond wrote: > Hello, > > On Sunday, 2008 February 3 at 10:27:07 +0100, Holger Eitzenberger wrote: > > Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxx> writes: > > > > > Ulogd2 was propagating through a stack 2 message for one single conntrack event. > > > This patch provides a fall back to on message per event. It also uses an enum to improve > > > code readability instead of direct access to array via numerical index. > > > > [ULOGD 15/15] NFCT: rework and let it scale > > > > from my last patchset? I'll happily change that code to keep the > > output key compatibility. > > As long as you maintain output key compatibility, I'm fine with it. We're still without decision on this problem and we thus don't have a working ulogd2 NFCT input plugin. On one side we've got Holger work which is quiet important but adds some kernel dependancies and in the other side my small work which will be at term compatible with Holger's work. Maybe someone form the team could apply the patch and let code be updated when Holger's kernel side code reach mainstream ? By the way, it could be interesting to plan an ulogd2 beta release in a not too far future. BR, -- Eric Leblond INL: http://www.inl.fr/ NuFW: http://www.nufw.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
