nf_conntrack - still missing one critical patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jozsef, Krzysztof

Have you had a chance to take a look at this missing bit?

Thanks,
Jeff.


On Feb 10, 2008 11:06 PM, Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Feb 5, 2008 9:47 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >> On Feb 5, 2008 4:16 PM, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> >> Patrick, I suppose you need a patch against the latest git, don't you?
> > Yes, please. I'll take you first patch for -stable though if you
> > send me a Signed-off-by: line.
>
> Please note the lastest git commit is missing one part (which was in
> Jozsef's original patch).
>
>         commit b2155e7f70b3f058efe94c0c459db023b05057bd
>         Author: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>         Date:   Thu Feb 7 17:54:56 2008 -0800
>
>             [NETFILTER]: nf_conntrack: TCP conntrack reopening fix
>
>
> I've tested the following missing patch, and it solves the cups slow
> printing problem.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c.org        2008-02-10 22:45:49 +0800
> +++ a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c    2008-02-10 22:45:56 +0800
> @@ -945,7 +945,7 @@
>
>         ct->proto.tcp.state = new_state;
>         if (old_state != new_state
> -           && new_state == TCP_CONNTRACK_CLOSE)
>
> +           && new_state == TCP_CONNTRACK_FIN_WAIT)
>                 ct->proto.tcp.seen[dir].flags |= IP_CT_TCP_FLAG_CLOSE_INIT;
>         timeout = ct->proto.tcp.retrans >= nf_ct_tcp_max_retrans
>                   && tcp_timeouts[new_state] > nf_ct_tcp_timeout_max_retrans
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux