Re: [conntrack-utils PATCH r7285 04/11] added alarm_pending()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2008/01/23 12:50, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Max Kellermann wrote:
> > +int alarm_pending(struct alarm_list *alarm, struct timeval *tv)
> > +{
> > +	if (list_empty(&alarm->head))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	if (tv != NULL)
> > +		*tv = alarm->tv;
> 
> This introduces an extra copy.

I know.  This patch should make transition to libevent smooth.
libevent still has this copy in evtimer_pending(), but it is called
rarely, and libevent does not do a lookup in 2048 lists in every main
loop iteration.

> > +	if (!alarm_pending(alarm, &tmp))
> > +		return 0;
> 
> I cannot think of a situation where alarm_pending returns true at the
> moment.

You mean, where alarm_pending returns false?  The check is just here
for completeness, you could replace it with an assertion.

Max

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux