On Jan 20 2008 18:19, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Jan 20 2008 14:42, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> > > Index: iptables-modules/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_iprange.h >> > > =================================================================== >> > > --- iptables-modules.orig/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_iprange.h >> > > +++ iptables-modules/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_iprange.h >> > Do we really want to keep this file? >> > >> If you value compatibilty, then yes. >> >> (Did I understand that correctly?) > > I thought the xt_iprange file included the old options, if thats > not the case then ignore my question. > > Options? xt_iprange r0 is the same as ipt_iprange, including binary layout of the struct and that. So we need to keep ipt_iprange.h. Or rather, keep struct ipt_iprange. I would not want to move struct ipt_iprange to xt_iprange.h because that means more maintenance overhead. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
